Georg Adelberger vs Max Hess
12. Lichtenberger Sommer, 2013 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Georg Adelberger vs Max Hess with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Georg Adelberger (1924)
- Black
- Max Hess (2013)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 12. Lichtenberger Sommer
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94)
About this chess game
This chess game between Georg Adelberger (1924) and Max Hess (2013) was played at 12. Lichtenberger Sommer in 2013 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Georg Adelberger games or Max Hess games? This Georg Adelberger vs Max Hess encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Georg Adelberger vs Max Hess?
Georg Adelberger vs Max Hess (2013) finished 0–1, a win for Max Hess.
What opening was played in Georg Adelberger vs Max Hess?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (ECO E94).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Georg Adelberger vs Max Hess, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.