Mark Adams vs Jaap Spreeuw
2006 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation, Early Deviations (B66).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mark Adams vs Jaap Spreeuw with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mark Adams (2000)
- Black
- Jaap Spreeuw (2289)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2006
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation, Early Deviations (B66)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mark Adams (2000) and Jaap Spreeuw (2289) was played in 2006 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation, Early Deviations (B66). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mark Adams games or Jaap Spreeuw games? This Mark Adams vs Jaap Spreeuw encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation, Early Deviations.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mark Adams vs Jaap Spreeuw?
Mark Adams vs Jaap Spreeuw (2006) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Mark Adams vs Jaap Spreeuw?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation, Early Deviations (ECO B66).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mark Adams vs Jaap Spreeuw, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.