Jose Esteban Acosta Mira vs Vicente Destruels Moreno
ESP/TC8/2A (ESP), 2011 · Result ½–½ · Semi-Slav Defense (D43).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jose Esteban Acosta Mira vs Vicente Destruels Moreno with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jose Esteban Acosta Mira (2190)
- Black
- Vicente Destruels Moreno (1956)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- ESP/TC8/2A (ESP)
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Semi-Slav Defense (D43)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jose Esteban Acosta Mira (2190) and Vicente Destruels Moreno (1956) was played at ESP/TC8/2A (ESP) in 2011 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Semi-Slav Defense (D43). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jose Esteban Acosta Mira games or Vicente Destruels Moreno games? This Jose Esteban Acosta Mira vs Vicente Destruels Moreno encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Semi-Slav Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jose Esteban Acosta Mira vs Vicente Destruels Moreno?
Jose Esteban Acosta Mira vs Vicente Destruels Moreno (2011) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Jose Esteban Acosta Mira vs Vicente Destruels Moreno?
The game opened with the Semi-Slav Defense (ECO D43).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jose Esteban Acosta Mira vs Vicente Destruels Moreno, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.