Jorian Jared Acosta Cubides vs Tromphin Sitorus
2010 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (B80).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jorian Jared Acosta Cubides vs Tromphin Sitorus with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jorian Jared Acosta Cubides (2039)
- Black
- Tromphin Sitorus (1684)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (B80)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jorian Jared Acosta Cubides (2039) and Tromphin Sitorus (1684) was played in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (B80). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jorian Jared Acosta Cubides games or Tromphin Sitorus games? This Jorian Jared Acosta Cubides vs Tromphin Sitorus encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jorian Jared Acosta Cubides vs Tromphin Sitorus?
Jorian Jared Acosta Cubides vs Tromphin Sitorus (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Jorian Jared Acosta Cubides vs Tromphin Sitorus?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (ECO B80).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jorian Jared Acosta Cubides vs Tromphin Sitorus, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.