Jorian Jared Acosta Cubides vs Elkin Dario Perez
2013 · Result 0–1 · Italian Game: Evans Gambit, Main Line (C52).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jorian Jared Acosta Cubides vs Elkin Dario Perez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jorian Jared Acosta Cubides (1977)
- Black
- Elkin Dario Perez (2159)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Italian Game: Evans Gambit, Main Line (C52)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jorian Jared Acosta Cubides (1977) and Elkin Dario Perez (2159) was played in 2013 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Italian Game: Evans Gambit, Main Line (C52). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jorian Jared Acosta Cubides games or Elkin Dario Perez games? This Jorian Jared Acosta Cubides vs Elkin Dario Perez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game: Evans Gambit, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jorian Jared Acosta Cubides vs Elkin Dario Perez?
Jorian Jared Acosta Cubides vs Elkin Dario Perez (2013) finished 0–1, a win for Elkin Dario Perez.
What opening was played in Jorian Jared Acosta Cubides vs Elkin Dario Perez?
The game opened with the Italian Game: Evans Gambit, Main Line (ECO C52).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jorian Jared Acosta Cubides vs Elkin Dario Perez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.