Jorian Jared Acosta Cubides vs Jake Espinosa
3. Ortega Rating, 2013 · Result ½–½ · Pirc Defense: Classical Variation (B08).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jorian Jared Acosta Cubides vs Jake Espinosa with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jorian Jared Acosta Cubides (1969)
- Black
- Jake Espinosa (2282)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 3. Ortega Rating
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Pirc Defense: Classical Variation (B08)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jorian Jared Acosta Cubides (1969) and Jake Espinosa (2282) was played at 3. Ortega Rating in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Pirc Defense: Classical Variation (B08). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jorian Jared Acosta Cubides games or Jake Espinosa games? This Jorian Jared Acosta Cubides vs Jake Espinosa encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Pirc Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jorian Jared Acosta Cubides vs Jake Espinosa?
Jorian Jared Acosta Cubides vs Jake Espinosa (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Jorian Jared Acosta Cubides vs Jake Espinosa?
The game opened with the Pirc Defense: Classical Variation (ECO B08).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jorian Jared Acosta Cubides vs Jake Espinosa, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.