Luis Ivan Acosta Cruz vs Jose Luis Torres Silva
2016 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation (A30).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Luis Ivan Acosta Cruz vs Jose Luis Torres Silva with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Luis Ivan Acosta Cruz (1811)
- Black
- Jose Luis Torres Silva (1739)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation (A30)
About this chess game
This chess game between Luis Ivan Acosta Cruz (1811) and Jose Luis Torres Silva (1739) was played in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation (A30). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Luis Ivan Acosta Cruz games or Jose Luis Torres Silva games? This Luis Ivan Acosta Cruz vs Jose Luis Torres Silva encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Luis Ivan Acosta Cruz vs Jose Luis Torres Silva?
Luis Ivan Acosta Cruz vs Jose Luis Torres Silva (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Jose Luis Torres Silva.
What opening was played in Luis Ivan Acosta Cruz vs Jose Luis Torres Silva?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation (ECO A30).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Luis Ivan Acosta Cruz vs Jose Luis Torres Silva, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.