Peter J E Ackley vs Pablo Miguel Moujan
Avison 2019 (ENG), 2019 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: King's English Variation (A20).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Peter J E Ackley vs Pablo Miguel Moujan with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Peter J E Ackley (2008)
- Black
- Pablo Miguel Moujan (1445)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Avison 2019 (ENG)
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation (A20)
About this chess game
This chess game between Peter J E Ackley (2008) and Pablo Miguel Moujan (1445) was played at Avison 2019 (ENG) in 2019 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation (A20). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Peter J E Ackley games or Pablo Miguel Moujan games? This Peter J E Ackley vs Pablo Miguel Moujan encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Peter J E Ackley vs Pablo Miguel Moujan?
Peter J E Ackley vs Pablo Miguel Moujan (2019) finished 0–1, a win for Pablo Miguel Moujan.
What opening was played in Peter J E Ackley vs Pablo Miguel Moujan?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation (ECO A20).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Peter J E Ackley vs Pablo Miguel Moujan, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.