Manfred Achenbach vs Rainer Oechslein
2017 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation (E63).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Manfred Achenbach vs Rainer Oechslein with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Manfred Achenbach (2083)
- Black
- Rainer Oechslein (2294)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation (E63)
About this chess game
This chess game between Manfred Achenbach (2083) and Rainer Oechslein (2294) was played in 2017 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation (E63). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Manfred Achenbach games or Rainer Oechslein games? This Manfred Achenbach vs Rainer Oechslein encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Manfred Achenbach vs Rainer Oechslein?
Manfred Achenbach vs Rainer Oechslein (2017) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Manfred Achenbach vs Rainer Oechslein?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation (ECO E63).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Manfred Achenbach vs Rainer Oechslein, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.