Sergey Abramov vs Nikolay Kuzin
Dimitrovgrad RUS, Petrosian Mem 09, 2009 · Result 0–1 · Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Sergey Abramov vs Nikolay Kuzin with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Sergey Abramov (2059)
- Black
- Nikolay Kuzin (2029)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Dimitrovgrad RUS, Petrosian Mem 09
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12)
About this chess game
This chess game between Sergey Abramov (2059) and Nikolay Kuzin (2029) was played at Dimitrovgrad RUS, Petrosian Mem 09 in 2009 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Sergey Abramov games or Nikolay Kuzin games? This Sergey Abramov vs Nikolay Kuzin encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Sergey Abramov vs Nikolay Kuzin?
Sergey Abramov vs Nikolay Kuzin (2009) finished 0–1, a win for Nikolay Kuzin.
What opening was played in Sergey Abramov vs Nikolay Kuzin?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (ECO D12).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Sergey Abramov vs Nikolay Kuzin, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.