Khaled Abdel Razik vs Alex Makatia
Zonal 4.2, 2000 · Result 1–0 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E36).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Khaled Abdel Razik vs Alex Makatia with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Khaled Abdel Razik (2318)
- Black
- Alex Makatia (1916)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Zonal 4.2
- Year
- 2000
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E36)
About this chess game
This chess game between Khaled Abdel Razik (2318) and Alex Makatia (1916) was played at Zonal 4.2 in 2000 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E36). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Khaled Abdel Razik games or Alex Makatia games? This Khaled Abdel Razik vs Alex Makatia encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Khaled Abdel Razik vs Alex Makatia?
Khaled Abdel Razik vs Alex Makatia (2000) finished 1–0, a win for Khaled Abdel Razik.
What opening was played in Khaled Abdel Razik vs Alex Makatia?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (ECO E36).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Khaled Abdel Razik vs Alex Makatia, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.