Gerwin Aalderink vs Aleksandr Perezhogin
SA-00128, 2010 · Result 1–0 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation (E21).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Gerwin Aalderink vs Aleksandr Perezhogin with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Gerwin Aalderink (2134)
- Black
- Aleksandr Perezhogin (2100)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- SA-00128
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation (E21)
About this chess game
This chess game between Gerwin Aalderink (2134) and Aleksandr Perezhogin (2100) was played at SA-00128 in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation (E21). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Gerwin Aalderink games or Aleksandr Perezhogin games? This Gerwin Aalderink vs Aleksandr Perezhogin encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Gerwin Aalderink vs Aleksandr Perezhogin?
Gerwin Aalderink vs Aleksandr Perezhogin (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Gerwin Aalderink.
What opening was played in Gerwin Aalderink vs Aleksandr Perezhogin?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation (ECO E21).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Gerwin Aalderink vs Aleksandr Perezhogin, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.